Avalanche vs snowball side-by-side — enter your debts and see your debt-free date.
Both methods pay the minimum on every debt, then throw every spare dollar at one target debt. They differ only in which debt gets the spare money.
In both, when a debt clears, its minimum payment rolls into the pot attacking the next one. That rollover is what makes either method accelerate, and it matters far more than the ordering.
Most debt payoff advice asserts that avalanche wins without saying by how much. Here is the actual gap, run through a full month-by-month simulation on this debt load:
| Debt | Balance | APR | Minimum |
|---|---|---|---|
| Store card | $900 | 26.99% | $35 |
| Credit card B | $2,200 | 18.99% | $55 |
| Personal loan | $4,900 | 12.50% | $165 |
| Credit card A | $6,500 | 22.99% | $130 |
| Car loan | $11,800 | 7.40% | $342 |
| Total | $26,300 | — | $727 |
Paying the $727 of minimums plus $300 extra each month — $1,027 total:
| Method | Debt-free in | Total interest | Debts gone by month 16 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avalanche | 31 months | $4,466.30 | 1 |
| Snowball | 31 months | $4,905.08 | 3 |
Two things stand out, and neither is what the usual advice implies.
They finish in the same month. Both clear the whole $26,300 in 31 months. Avalanche's advantage is $438.78 of interest — about 9% less — not a shorter payoff.
The early experience is completely different. Avalanche clears the store card in month 3 and then nothing at all until month 20, because it is grinding away at a $6,500 balance. Snowball clears the store card in month 3, credit card B in month 9 and the personal loan in month 16 — three accounts closed and three fewer bills to think about, in half the time.
Run the same debts with no extra payment at all — minimums only, with rollover — and the picture changes far more than the method ever does:
That extra $300 a month saves $5,039.41 and 19 months.
Put the two decisions side by side: choosing avalanche over snowball is worth $438.78. Finding an extra $300 a month is worth $5,039.41 — roughly eleven times more.
The avalanche-versus-snowball argument gets the attention because it is the interesting question. It is not the important one. If choosing snowball is what gets you to actually keep paying the extra, snowball is the better method for you by a wide margin, and no spreadsheet disagrees.
A decision rule that respects both the maths and the reality:
Whichever you choose, the mechanics are the same: never miss a minimum, put everything spare on one target, and roll each cleared minimum into the next target rather than absorbing it back into spending. That last step is where most plans quietly fail.
The projection assumes a few things that real life does not always honour:
If a balance is carrying a promotional 0% rate, check its expiry date before choosing a payoff order. Clearing it before that date usually outranks any rate-based ordering.
Every figure on this page comes from a month-by-month simulation of the debt set above: interest accrues monthly at APR ÷ 12 on the outstanding balance, minimums are paid on all debts, the extra payment plus any freed-up minimums go to the current target, and the run ends when every balance reaches zero. Avalanche orders by descending APR, snowball by ascending balance. Nothing is rounded until display.
The planner runs entirely in your browser. Nothing you enter is transmitted or stored.
This is an estimate for planning, not financial advice, and it does not account for your individual circumstances. See the disclaimer. If a projection here looks wrong, send the balances and rates you used and it gets checked.